CHNI Forums Home

Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

CHNI Home
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register for Posting Access 


High Mass Question
 Moderated by: Rob, Jim Anderson, Dave Armstrong  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
cyanheaven
Member


Joined: Tue Apr 8th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 29
First Name: Callie
Gender: Female
Faith History: Baptist/ Bapticostal/ Baptist/ currently prefer BaptoCatholic
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri May 2nd, 2008 06:47 pm

Quote

Reply
I recently watched a High Mass from the 1950's and yesterday i attended an Extraordinary Form of the 1962 Missal. It was a great experience, though I will admit i missed being able to go forward to receive a blessing.

My question is this: During both of these masses the priest having one or two attendants would have his outer garb grabbed as if tending to a train and once while he was praying facing the front his outer garb was raised by a single kneeling attendant.  What was the significance of this?


I hope my descriptions are accurate. 

 

Thanks,

Last edited on Fri May 2nd, 2008 06:57 pm by cyanheaven


Quote

Reply
David W. Emery
Network Helper
 

Joined: Fri Sep 29th, 2006
Location: Brownsville, Texas USA
Posts: 1714
First Name: David
Gender: Male
Faith History: Catholic
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 3rd, 2008 01:24 am

Quote

Reply
Exactly as you surmised, Callie: “tending the train.” There may be a deeper meaning, but I am not aware of it.

David


Quote

Reply
CajunRick
Network Helper


Joined: Fri Sep 29th, 2006
Location: Houma, Louisiana USA
Posts: 4981
First Name: Rick (& Kermie)
Gender: Male
Faith History: Lifetime Catholic, Latin Rite
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 3rd, 2008 03:03 pm

Quote

Reply
Many of the movements and motions in the "old mass" became ritualized versions of simple methods of assistance.  The actions you indicate were simply to help the celebrant avoid tripping on what originally were long, ornate vestments.

Liturgical action was so diverse and "experimental" prior to the Council of Trent that after the council, the mass was ritualized and formalized to the point that no diversity was permitted at all.  Many of the motions that originally had meaning and function in the 1600's had lost their meaning by the 1950's but they remained in force.  Pope John XXIII began the simplification process, and Pope Paul VI finalized it.  Many think the reforms of Paul VI went too far, and the liturgy is in a revisionary state once again.

For example, the priest once wore a vestment called a maniple.  It was a handkerchief of sorts fastened to his left arm, and it was quite useful prior to air conditioning.  It never had a real liturgical meaning other than to help the priest wipe off his perspiration, although its function was ritualized and esconsed in the "Tridentine mass".



____________________
Understanding is the reward of faith. Therefore seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand. - Augustine

Rick Luquette
Luquette Lane

Quote

Reply

 Current time is 06:35 am




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez