 |
| Author | Post |
|---|
CajunRick
Network Helper
| Joined: | Fri Sep 29th, 2006 |
| Location: | Houma, Louisiana USA |
| Posts: | 5353 |
| First Name: | Rick (& Kermie) | | Gender: | Male | | Faith History: | Lifetime Catholic, Latin Rite |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26th, 2006 07:04 pm |
|
| A user has let me know that a message she tried to post was refused because it was too large. Has anyone else run into this problem? In her case she was attempting to post an exchange of emails she had with someone else and the size of the message was unusually large, so it's quite possible she was correct. However, I also know sometimes other problems can occur with computer systems, so I'm just wondering if a size limitation has been a problem for anyone else.
____________________
Understanding is the reward of faith. Therefore seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand. - Augustine
Rick Luquette
Luquette Lane
|
|
|
Talithacumi
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 30th, 2006 |
| Location: | Eastern Ohio, USA |
| Posts: | 268 |
| First Name: | Cheri | | Gender: | Female | | Faith History: | Cradle Catholic - Latin Rite |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26th, 2006 09:33 pm |
|
cajunrick wrote: A user has let me know that a message she tried to post was refused because it was too large. Has anyone else run into this problem? In her case she was attempting to post an exchange of emails she had with someone else and the size of the message was unusually large, so it's quite possible she was correct. However, I also know sometimes other problems can occur with computer systems, so I'm just wondering if a size limitation has been a problem for anyone else.
Rick,
I vaguely remember having a problem something like this when we were first testing out this new format, and I wrote and told you about it and I remember you said something about the subject line... can't remember exactly what you told me to do... does anything I'm saying jog your memory at all? (My memory is so bad sometimes!) Anyway, whatever it was that you'd told me to do, it worked. Just wish I could remember what it was! :? 
JMJ
- Cheri
____________________
“We do not want a Church that will move with the world; we want a Church that will move the world.”
- G.K. Chesterton
|
|
|
CajunRick
Network Helper
| Joined: | Fri Sep 29th, 2006 |
| Location: | Houma, Louisiana USA |
| Posts: | 5353 |
| First Name: | Rick (& Kermie) | | Gender: | Male | | Faith History: | Lifetime Catholic, Latin Rite |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26th, 2006 11:09 pm |
|
Talithacumi wrote: I vaguely remember having a problem something like this when we were first testing out this new format, and I wrote and told you about it and I remember you said something about the subject line... can't remember exactly what you told me to do... does anything I'm saying jog your memory at all? (My memory is so bad sometimes!) Anyway, whatever it was that you'd told me to do, it worked. Just wish I could remember what it was! :?
That was a limit on the old software that subject lines couldn't be more than 55 characters. You had replied to a message with a subject that was already 54 characters long, and when the software added the "RE:" at the beginning it exceeded the maximum limit.
What I'm asking now is if anyone has had a problem with too much message content being rejected.
____________________
Understanding is the reward of faith. Therefore seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand. - Augustine
Rick Luquette
Luquette Lane
|
|
|
Current time is 10:25 am | |
|
|
|
|
|
